In this episode of Supply Chain Dialogue, Daniel Helmig and AI co-host Amy discuss the pitfalls of relying solely on sophisticated technology for achieving net-zero scope three emissions. They explore the concept of 'digital displacement,' where companies substitute technological solutions for necessary operational changes, leading to minimal actual reductions in emissions. Real-life examples demonstrate that a low-tech approach often surpasses high-tech solutions in terms of meaningful impact. The discussion also critiques the European Union's Digital Product Passport legislation, arguing it creates more compliance theatre rather than driving real emission reductions. Listeners are encouraged to focus on simple, targeted tools and human-centred approaches for effective supply chain transformation.

In this episode of 'Supply Chain Dialogues,' Daniel Helmig and AI co-host Amy delve into the ineffectiveness of current EU regulatory policies in achieving net-zero emissions by 2040. They reveal that positive perceptions of regulatory frameworks actually correlate with less action on emission reductions, particularly due to the focus on easier-to-control Scope 1 and 2 emissions while neglecting more impactful Scope 3. The episode critiques the 'sustainability bureaucracy' that diverts resources from practical actions to compliance activities and calls for a fundamental revision of regulatory approaches, emphasizing real transformation over compliance theatre.

What if the most rational business practice is actually killing climate action?

In this episode, Daniel and AI-mee reveal a shocking discovery from Daniel's doctoral research: companies that conduct thorough cost-benefit analyses are significantly LESS likely to implement climate solutions. We're not talking about climate deniers or cash-strapped startups – these are sophisticated, well-resourced companies doing exactly what business schools teach.

The twist? The bigger and more financially sophisticated the company, the worse this problem becomes. It turns out that economic rationality might be the biggest barrier to saving the planet.

You'll discover:

• Why marathon sustainability investments keep losing to sprint financial metrics

• The hidden bias in evaluation frameworks that nobody talks about

• How the world's most sophisticated companies are trapped by their own financial expertise

If you've ever wondered why smart companies with good intentions struggle with climate action, this episode will change how you think about business decision-making forever.

Next Episode: "The Policy Paradox: Why Regulations Reduce Action"

In this episode of The Supply Chain Dialogues, Daniel Helmig explores why achieving net-zero Scope 3 emissions by 2040 is so challenging. Featuring an interview with, let's call her, Dr. Elizabeth Schmitt, a CPO of a company participating in the research Daniel did. Based on her request, the interview is fully anonymous, since she feels repercussions from her former employer could happen when talking openly.

In the first episode of Season Four of 'Supply Chain Dialogues,' host Daniel Helmig discusses the surprising findings from the massive doctoral research on supply chain climate action in the discrete manufacturing industry. Contrary to his initial expectations, Daniel discovered significant flaws in the conventional wisdom surrounding emissions measurement, cost-benefit analysis, and regulatory impact. The episode sets the stage for a season-long exploration of these discoveries, emphasising the critical role of German manufacturing companies and highlighting the importance of focusing on Scope 3 emissions for effective climate action. With insights from 248 surveyed companies, the research aims to challenge and redefine global strategies for mitigating climate change.